Anneal
Compress existing models. Recover capability through training. Compare against the original.
StudioC makes capable AI practical on hardware a business controls — through smaller models, faster local infrastructure and a private workspace.
8.48 GB model file · Established build
Above 80% of teacher scores · Matched tests
287/300 before correction · Unchanged weights
Established model · GSM8K 91.9% · MMLU 97.1% · HellaSwag 100.6% · ARC Challenge 92.0% · HumanEval 81.4%
Compress existing models. Recover capability through training. Compare against the original.
Our Rust and Metal runtime. The graph, kernels and serving path built for local hardware.
A private workspace for company knowledge, cited answers and tools that do useful work.
Our next research frontier: execution inside active reasoning. Protocol working; capability gains still to prove.
Search can be a business of its own.Companies such as Exa and Tavily have built businesses around search APIs for AI. StudioC Search puts search and page retrieval inside our stack, without requiring a key to an external search API. A standalone StudioC Search API is a future commercial opportunity.
One stack. Several routes to revenue.Local installations and support create the first customer relationship. Dedicated private hosting is planned. Search APIs and specialist knowledge subscriptions could create additional recurring revenue. These future offers would sit alongside local installs: no change to their operation and no move of customer data.
Founder-funded by Harry, Matt and Riley. Pre-seed funding advances business pilots, runtime integration and research. Harness currently uses stock models. Future standalone services would need product validation and source-rights review.
A 27B model compressed to 8.48 GB, retaining more than 80% of teacher performance across five matched benchmarks. The established recovered build passes all five retention gates.
| Benchmark | Original correct | Established · 12 Sep | Newer · 13 Sep |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K · maths | 246/250 | 226/250 · 91.9% | 222/250 · 90.2% |
| MMLU · knowledge | 479/570 | 465/570 · 97.1% | 461/570 · 96.2% |
| HellaSwag · commonsense | 685/1000 | 689/1000 · 100.6% | 693/1000 · 101.2% |
| ARC Challenge · science | 363/500 | 334/500 · 92.0% | 334/500 · 92.0% |
| HumanEval · code | 129/164 | 105/164 · 81.4% | 94/164 · 72.9% |
Each cell shows correct answers and retained teacher score. Established build: 5/5 gates above 80%; newer variant: 4/5, with coding recovery in progress. GSM8K: 8-shot, strict match, 1,024-token cap. MMLU: 5-shot. HellaSwag: 10-shot; ARC: 25-shot, normalized accuracy. HumanEval: unfiltered pass@1, 1,024-token cap. Matched subsets, materialized BF16 on CUDA; separate from native execution.
At 4K context · 64 generated tokens
Newer recovered variant · One measured run
125.26 tok/s prompt processing · 24.07 s load.
8.48 GB model file · 10.707 GiB resident weights · 11.936 GiB peak RSS. Memory and long-context optimisation remain in development; sub-10 GB total runtime is not yet achieved.
Metal numerical check: mean forward KL 0.12324, argmax agreement 84.18%, 1,024 positions across four contexts. Passed its comparison gate; separate from task accuracy.
| Paired workload | Speed ratio |
|---|---|
| Graph building | 3.07× |
| Dispatch overhead | 1.90× |
| Fused 2,000-operation chain | 7.95× |
| 64 MB tanh-GELU activation | 6.48× |
| fp16 4096³ matrix multiplication | 1.00× |
| Decode microbenchmark | 0.93× |
Paired medians, n=14; 174/174 parity cases. Component gains are separate from full-model speed. The decode microbenchmark is 408.5 vs 437 tok/s.
Private AI that can actually do work. Company knowledge, tools and approvals in a workspace deployed on hardware the business controls.
Cited answers and source passages. Reusable inline tools and spreadsheet charts. Meeting transcripts, owned actions and scheduled reports on your machine.
Web search without an API key to an external search provider. Direct mail integration with Outlook, Gmail and IMAP hosts. Certificate-based remote access to your appliance.
Versioned source references, workflows and templates alongside company files. Read-only, approved writes or broader access per chat. External connections stay optional.
Six packs: one national core and five specialist libraries. Federal context, with every state and territory available in the jurisdiction settings.
Federal · NSW · VIC · QLD · WA · SA · TAS · ACT · NT
Privacy, consumer law, employment records and shared business obligations.
Contracts, licensing, WHS, variations and payment claims, with NSW guidance.
Privacy, consent, clinical records and provider obligations.
Conveyancing law, client identity, costs disclosure and settlement checks.
ATO guidance, GST/BAS, payroll, super and practice records.
Agency and tenancy rules, disclosure, trust money and property management.
Built to support professionals. Professionals in their respective fields verify current sources and make final legal, clinical, tax, financial and compliance decisions. The packs support research and drafting; they do not replace professional judgement.
Development inventory, v2026.08.1. Source coverage varies by field and jurisdiction; current state-specific material is concentrated in NSW. Professional review and release signing remain pending. References can cite different sections of one authority.
Automatic correction of malformed structured tool calls — without changing model weights. Same 300 prompts, same stock 4-bit model.
Exercism-based code set. Tests rerun on a clean checkout. A separate, small internal test.
Start with the workflow.Closed pilots in preparation. LocallyAI AU handles the appliance, on-site setup, accounts, groups and support. Trained contractors are the planned route to wider delivery.
A clear release path.Code availability and free personal/business use are planned; licence terms remain in development. Embedding in another product will require approval and may carry a fee.
Our next research frontier. E-RLM explores a different model/runtime boundary: deterministic execution inside active reasoning, with returned values carried into subsequent thinking and full files assembled at the end.
The original two scripted demonstrations. Orange values and final files come from the runtime, never re-typed by the model.
The execution protocol and runtime are working. The current fine-tune has learned the execution notation, but has not yet demonstrated improved problem-solving or reliable execution selection.
Held-out problems → execution selection → correct answers → clean stopping → generalisation.
A foundation we can test.The Rust controller operates inside decoding; an isolated Python/SymPy worker executes operations. Both hosts passed 61 runtime gates and eight focused recovery tests. The original demonstrations show the intended interaction, not a reasoning benchmark.
Fund the platform. Advance the frontier.Business pilots and compressed-runtime integration lead the next product milestones. E-RLM follows an explicit capability gate: demonstrate useful, reliable execution on unseen problems before making a product-performance claim.
13 September 2026. Training completed: 141 steps, six epochs, 110 corpus replays; validation NLL 2.257 → 0.682. These are process measurements. Initial matched pilot: maths 7/8 versus base 8/8; reasoning 2/4 versus 4/4; neither selected execution. Small sets, full campaign incomplete. Earlier validation contamination and conflicting training targets prompted data repairs; the measured adapter has not established a reasoning gain.